Journal of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

Indexed in /covered by CAS, KoreaScience & DOI/Crossref:eISSN 2508-5956   pISSN 2287-2930

Table. 2.

Table. 2.

Safety profile of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass

Author (publication year)30 day mortality (%)30 day morbidity (%)Conversion Rate (%)Late complications (%)Mean operating time (mins)Leaks (%)Major bleeding (%)Marginal ulcer (%)Bile Reflux (%)Anaemia (%)Remarks
Lee et al. (2005) [13]07.5%2.5% (1 patient)7.5%148NANA5.0%NANA
Wang et al. (2005) [15]0.474.3017.7950.70.78.0NA9.7Revision 1.7%
Rutledge and Walsh (2005) [12]0.085.90.1711.9537.51.08NA5.6NA4.9Malnutrition 1.1%, Revision rate 1%
Carbajo et al. (2005) [16]0.9%3.7%0.9%NA931.90.9%NANA0.1%
Peraglie et al. (2008) [17]012.5% (2 patients)0NA78NA6.2%NANANA
Piazza et al. (2011) [18]0.5%5.6%NANA120NA31.5NANA
Noun et al. (2012) [19]02.704.7890.55.60.4NA
Lee et al. (2012) [20]0.178.5%0.1NA115.31.30.20.6NANARevision 2.8%
Milone et al. (2013) [21]NANANANANANANANANANA
Musella et al. (2014) [22]0.25.51.29.0951.032.51.70.95.3
Kular et al. (2014) [23]0.185.909%520.10.30.62.07.6Excessive weight loss 0.1%, Revision 0.2%
Disse et al. (2014) [24]010% (2 patients)010% (2 patients)105 (shorter than RYGB)05% (1 patient, port site bleeding)5% (1 patient, smoiker0NA10% GERD
Bruzzi et al. (2015) [25]03 month morbidity 7.90.87.9NA0.80.81.61.6, intractable converted to RYGB3.2
Guenzi et al. (2015) [26]NANANA7.5NA2.43.64.9NANANo difference in complication rates between diabetics and non diabetics
Peraglie (2016) [27]0NA0NA71NANANANANAOverall complication 4.5% (minor) Readmission 1.2%
Jammu and Sharma (2016) [28]0NANANA57.500.40.60.44.913.1% hypoalbumiemia, MGB 0% leak compared to sleeve 1.4%, RYGB 0.3%
Kansou et al. (2016) [29]0NA0NANA5.11.47.6NANAStenosis 16.9%
Plamper et al. (2016) [30]03.0NANA81.70.61.2NANANAMGB lower 30 day complication rate than SG
J Metab Bariatr Surg 2016;5:45-52 https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2016.5.2.45
© 2016 J Metab Bariatr Surg