Journal of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

Indexed in /covered by CAS, KoreaScience & DOI/Crossref:eISSN 2508-5956   pISSN 2287-2930

Table. 5.

Table. 5.

Comparison of parameters related to CVD risk between LRYGB and LSG at 1 year follow-up

 VariablesLRYGB (n=55)LSG (n=12)P value
BMI (kg/m2) 27.86±5.31 28.04±7.630.567
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)169.25±32.39182.42±36.960.218
HDL (mg/dL) 59.93±15.15 53.42±10.550.163
SBP (mmHg)119.09±16.57118.33±10.520.880
Hypertension24 (43.64)7 (58.33)0.355
T2DM22 (40.00)4 (33.33)0.753
Tobacco use16 (29.09)1 (8.33)0.270
FRS ARR (%) 4.13±5.08 3.80±3.500.788
PCE ARR (%) 2.70±0.52 1.72±0.490.799
KRPM ARR (%) 1.03±1.85 0.92±0.970.776
Heart/Vascular age AAR 10.86±13.32 13.17±12.100.582

Variables = number (%); HDL = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP = systolic blood pressure; FRS = Framingham CVD risk score; PCE = ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation; KRPM = Korean prediction model for ASCVD; ARR = Absolute risk reduction; AAR = Absolute age reduction; RRR=Relative risk reduction.

J Metab Bariatr Surg 2019;8:1-7 https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2019.8.1.1
© 2019 J Metab Bariatr Surg